Disable Preloader

CaseLaw

Kanu & Sons V. FBN Plc (2006) CLR 5(d) (SC)

Judgement delivered on May 26th 2006

Brief

  • Acceptance of offer
  • Construction of a contract
  • Contract that is not ex facie illegal
  • Offeror
  • Concurrent findings of fact
  • Negligence

Facts

This appeal revolves around Bank/customer relationship that went sour. The Appellant company was the customer and the Respondent the bank. The dispute arose following a loan granted to the Appellant to enable it import for resale in Nigeria a quantity of stockfish. The loan was to be repaid on 30/12/89. The Appellant did not pay on due date. Rather the Appellant claimed that the Respondent negligently handled the shipment process. It then brought a suit at the Aba High Court of Abia State on 1st November, 1991 claiming against the Respondent as Defendant the following:

  • "a.
    An order of this Honourable Court compelling the Defendants to Waive or absolve or write off the sum of N10,805.000.00 (Ten million, eight hundred and five thousand Naira) being the cost of 2,900 bales of stockfish destroyed by the Health Authorities as a result on the Defenders negligence; or
  • Alternatively

  • b.
    N30,000,000.00 (Thirty million Naira) as special and general damages for negligence."

The Plaintiff filed a Statement of Claim and in reaction the Defendant filed an amended Statement of Defence to which was sub-joined a counter-'claim which reads:

  • "i.
    The said total of N19,954,138.80 due on the Plaintiffs account Nos.004/02/01765/5 and 00102017655.
  • ii.
    An order directing the Plaintiff to liquidate the said outstanding total sums within 3 (three months) from the date of judgment or as the Honourable Court may deem fit.
  • iii.
    Interest on the said total capital sum or any balance thereon at the rate of N10.00 (Ten Naira) per centum per annum commencing from the date of judgment."

The suit was heard by Ogbuagu J. (as he then was). The Plaintiff called three witnesses and the Defendant two. In a judgment spanning 92 foolscap pages, the trial Judge on 8-7-97 dismissed the Plaintiff's suit. He granted the first head of the counter-claim followed by an order that the Plaintiff liquidate the judgment debt within twelve months with effect from 1 -9-97. This claim for interest was refused.

The Plaintiff was dissatisfied and brought an appeal before the Port-Harcourt Division of the Court of Appeal (i.e. 'the Court below’). On 21-6-2001, the Court below in a unanimous Judgment, dismissed Plaintiff's appeal. The Plaintiff has come before this Court on a final appeal.

Issues

  • 1.
    Whether the Respondent's charging of 361 /2% on the loan given to the...
    Read More